The California Correctional Peace Officers Association (CCPOA) is the union for prison guards. I'm all for unions for prison guards. They have a tough job, horrible working conditions (uh, prison), and I certain would not want their job.
I believe their union should have a loud and robust voice on such things as pay, working conditions, health-care benefits, and retirement pension.
But prison guards, or correctional officers, as the prefer to be called (even though they don't do much correcting), should have no voice on sentencing policy. Think of it like the maker of electric chairs giving big bucks to politicians that support the pro-death.
When it comes to locking people up, guess which side the union takes? They want more prisoners. For prison guards, prisoners are jobs. And the more prisoners the better. More prisoners means more guards and more union power to get more prisoners. Shame.
In 1994, the CCPOA "strongly backed" (that's their words) Prop 184, three strikes and you're out.
In 2004, the CCPOA strongly opposed Prop 66 which would have softened the state's three-strikes law by restricting the second and third strikes to violent felonies. The proposition was narrowly defeated.
Now they're against California's Prop 5. To be honest, the details of Prop 5 aren't important. Not to the union. All that matters is whether or not the proposition would increase or decrease the number of prisoners. Prop 5 would divert people away from the prison system (related to non-violent drug offenders). That's a good thing if you're a tax payer or a human being. But it's bad if you see the prison complex as one giant jobs program.
When it comes to government jobs programs, I'd much prefer to actually build roads and bridges and parks, WPA style. But that, I suppose, is socialist.